<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laurence John UK Seed Technology VC &#187; semantic vector true-knowledge twine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laurencejohn.com/tag/semantic-vector-true-knowledge-twine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laurencejohn.com</link>
	<description>A Brit Different</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:38:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Semantic vectors and bounded subjects</title>
		<link>http://laurencejohn.com/2009/04/12/semantic-vectors-and-bounded-subjects/</link>
		<comments>http://laurencejohn.com/2009/04/12/semantic-vectors-and-bounded-subjects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic vector true-knowledge twine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurencejohn.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a request! Does anyone out there know if it&#8217;s possible to capture the bounds of a subject domain, out there on the inter-tubes I mean. For example, if a surveyor came to my house, he could describe it &#8230; <a href="http://laurencejohn.com/2009/04/12/semantic-vectors-and-bounded-subjects/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a request!</p>
<p>Does anyone out there know if it&#8217;s possible to capture the bounds of a subject domain, out there on the inter-tubes I mean. For example, if a surveyor came to my house, he could describe it pretty succinctly and appropriately comprehensively but if I do a search on blood coagulation measurement &#8211; I get nothing of the kind. &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=coagulation+devices&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">Coagulation measurement devices</a>&#8220;&#8230; I get 436,000 articles from uncle Google but not a &#8220;Read these articles and you have it covered&#8221;, not &#8220;here are the dimensions/vectors of the subject.. click on these and you&#8217;ll have it covered&#8221;. Can it be so hard?</p>
<p>With semantic web technologies, ontologies and knowledge bases &#8211; can it be so hard to use services like <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twine_first_mainstream_semantic_web_app.php">Twine</a>, <a href="http://www.trueknowledge.com/">True Knowledge</a> etc etc to build subject maps.</p>
<p>You could even take me on a tour of the web, showing me where to click and learn! Or if I click on a &#8220;Hitler&#8217;s a nice chap&#8221; article.. perhaps you could show me that &#8220;counter view points&#8221; exist. Well show them to me!</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t creationist articles be a widget-click away from Darwinist articles etc etc.. this seems a rich theme. Anyone wanna discuss&#8230;. there&#8217;s tech in here, there&#8217;s value, interesting UI&#8217;s etc. anyone start something in this field?</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Flaurencejohn.com%2F2009%2F04%2F12%2Fsemantic-vectors-and-bounded-subjects%2F&amp;title=Semantic%20vectors%20and%20bounded%20subjects" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://laurencejohn.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laurencejohn.com/2009/04/12/semantic-vectors-and-bounded-subjects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

